In March, historical past was made when Avatar: The Final Airbender was tailored right into a live-action reboot that was thought-about satisfactory by followers. When a former dwell motion model was so unhealthy that it turned followers off the franchise altogether, we had been fearful about Netflix’s eight-episode try. There’s one thing so magical and harmless about Nickelodeon’s authentic Avatar: The Final Airbender and even its sequel, The Legend of Korra.
Whereas Netflix’s model remains to be pleasant, it doesn’t maintain the identical pleasure and surprise as the unique sequence. With at this time’s know-how, animated sequence that we by no means thought could possibly be tailored into dwell motion now have that functionality (with large budgets and plenty of CGI, in fact). However simply because they are often tailored doesn’t imply they need to be. Generally, the unique magic of a primary go at a sequence is what makes it particular. And there are many animated sequence that ought to by no means be tailored right into a dwell motion model.
The Rugrats (1991 – 2004)
![](https://thoughtcatalog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Rugrats.jpg?w=768)
This is perhaps type of apparent, but when The Rugrats went live-action, it will simply be creepy. Think about CGI speaking infants? That’s not one thing I ever wish to image. Tommy, Chuckie, Phil, Lil, Angelica, Suzie (and later Kimmy) have rapport and imaginations not like every other present since. However a live-action model would require both growing old the characters up from infants into children, which eliminates a few of the present’s innocence, or in some way making infants speak. Plus, as a result of they typically go on imaginary adventures to unusual lands, The Rugrats in actual life would require a reasonably large funds and set design division.
The Magic Faculty Bus (1994 – 1997)
![](https://thoughtcatalog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Magic-School-Bus.jpg?w=768)
Who else remembers studying in regards to the biology due to Ms. Frizzle’s area journey inside an actual human’s physique? The Magic Faculty Bus made unattainable adventures a actuality, corresponding to time and area journey, all within the service of training. Whereas rewatching it at this time is all the time a good time–Lily Tomlin was the voice of Ms. Frizzle so it was a fairly high-quality present–a live-action reboot would require fairly a little bit of effort for a fairly low pay-off. We doubt many adults would watch the sequence, and with out the artwork of the animation, the adventures might lose a few of their quirky creativity.
Journey Time (2010 – 2018)
![](https://thoughtcatalog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Adventure-Time.webp?w=768)
Journey Time is already bizarre sufficient with out including in particular results and precise human our bodies. Between its animation model taking part in its personal position within the present and the character of the ever-changing magical surroundings, a live-action reboot would learn extra like an Ari Astor movie and fewer like a kid-friendly dream world.
SpongeBob SquarePants (1999 – )
![](https://thoughtcatalog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Spongebob-Squarepants.webp?w=768)
Sure, many of the cartoons on this record would simply be plain odd if tailored right into a live-action reboot, and SpongeBob SquarePants positively deserves to be on that record. Funnily sufficient, it was tailored right into a Broadway musical, which is about as live-action as it will possibly get, and it was really an extremely transferring, humorous, and spectacular musical. However as a live-action sequence? No approach. One factor musicals and cartoons have in widespread is that they will and ought to be bigger than life. However live-action sequence and movies typically want some form of foundation in actuality and grounding. SpongeBob ought to by no means be grounded, and never simply because it takes place beneath the ocean. Folks dressed because the characters, like within the musical, would look cheesy in a sequence, however CGI variations of the Spongebob characters would simply be off-putting and unnatural, irrespective of how good it’s.
BoJack Horseman (2014 – 2020)
![](https://thoughtcatalog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Bojack-Horesman.jpg?w=768)
We’re not simply enthusiastic about children’ cartoons, which frequently lose their innocence in a live-action reboot. However grownup cartoons, like BoJack Horseman, would lose one thing else if tailored right into a live-action model. A lot of the present is wrapped up within the artwork of the animation. Fantastical components (corresponding to animal characters and dream sequences) morph with realism to inform a narrative past a easy script and plot. BoJack Horseman makes use of the animation, together with the soundtrack, to elicit feelings of nostalgia, empathy, hopelessness, and extra. If we introduced a few of these magical realism components into live-action, I can’t assist however fear that BoJack would lose its emotional coronary heart, merely changing that with the goofiness of a speaking horse.