It’s been 25 years since Brendan Fraser dazzled audiences in The Mummy. Right here’s a retrospective have a look at why it was such a smash success.
In Could 1999, Stephen Sommers’ The Mummy hit theaters around the globe. A remake of Karl Freund’s movie of the identical title, the spectacle-heavy creature characteristic exploded from the crypt to make over $416 million on the field workplace and kick off a franchise that spawned two sequels, an animated sequence, and even a number of spinoffs concerning the mighty Scorpion King. Extra importantly, The Mummy immortalized itself as a must-watch blockbuster that is perhaps much more revered than Freund’s authentic movie looking back.
Extra Indiana Jones than Karl Freund
![](https://thoughtcatalog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Mummy.webp?w=768)
From the early Nineteen Thirties to the mid Nineteen Fifties, the Common Monsters ran rampant in Hollywood. From Dracula to The Mummy and Creature from the Black Lagoon, these photos didn’t solely spook up the field workplace, however additionally they changed into mega merchandise machines. As with all traits, nevertheless, the viewers curiosity diminished over time and the following fad took over.
A long time later, Common Photos rolled the cube and revisited The Mummy in 1999. Just like the 1932 movie, the central villain stays Imhotep (Arnold Vosloo), a resurrected excessive priest with supernatural powers and nefarious intentions. On this model, Brendan Fraser performs a brand new protagonist named Rick O’Connell. Rick isn’t alone on this film, being joined by different important characters corresponding to Evelyn Carnahan (Rachel Weisz), Jonathan Carnahan (John Hannah) and Ardeth Bay (Oded Fehr).
Whereas The Mummy establishes Imhotep as a reputable menace right here, it additionally builds up Rick as a real swashbuckling journey hero, whom the viewers will get behind. An Indiana Jones archetype, Rick rushes into motion first and asks questions later, however he’s by no means wanting a witty one-liner or two – regardless of how dangerous the state of affairs seems. Resultantly, The Mummy bursts with an exhilarating pleasure and unabashed good time feeling that’s akin to Raiders of the Misplaced Ark or Temple of Doom. It values thrills and spills greater than chills, inspiring audiences to deal with it as if it’s a cinema equal of a theme park journey. In the identical approach that Indiana Jones films maintain a timeless and rewatchable high quality, the identical may be mentioned about The Mummy because the film by no means stops being enjoyable and entertaining – whether or not it’s the primary or fifteenth watch.
All hail the cool Imhotep
![](https://thoughtcatalog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Mummy-Imhotep.jpg?w=768)
Take nothing away from Boris Karloff’s portrayal of Imhotep. The legendary thespian introduced a hypnotizing presence to the character and made individuals consider this mystical monster was a harrowing menace. Nevertheless, Arnold Vosloo breathes a singular menace into his interpretation of Imhotep that fits the period. He’s a supernatural Hans Gruber, oozing bucketloads of charisma and showcasing a big selection of breathtaking powers in equal measure.
Vosloo’s Imhotep additionally falls firmly into the “lovable” dangerous man class, since his motivations make full sense and some fools undergo his wrath – each instantly and not directly. (Did anybody even shed a tear when the weasley and sycophantic Beni Gabor meets his maker after unleashing the scarabs? Unlikely.) In The Mummy, Imhotep doesn’t strut round as a conventional film monster like Karloff’s model; as a substitute, he’s extra like the proper motion film antagonist – by no means missing appeal or a cool issue, as he makes the viewers wish to see extra of him on display.
It’s testomony to his recognition that Imhotep returned virtually immediately for The Mummy Returns in 2001. Regardless of the presence of one other antagonist within the type of Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson’s Scorpion King within the movie, everybody knew that with out Vosloo’s magical mummy the movie wouldn’t be the identical. Living proof: See how 2008’s The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor suffered when it excluded the fan-favorite villain. It’s not outrageous to say that as a lot as Brendan Fraser’s Rick O’Connell is paramount to the franchise’s success, so too is Vosloo’s Imhotep.
The action-adventure components of The Mummy labored again then, nevertheless it received’t now
With horror movies experiencing an odd time towards the tip of the twentieth century, The Mummy selected the proper path by dialing down the scares and upping the journey. It understood how moviegoers weren’t within the temper to be frightened; they needed to be entertained. Certain, the movie dumbed down the unique terrifying premise in favor of a extra cartoonish and popcorn blockbuster method. But, contemplating the trilogy revamped a billion {dollars} on the field workplace, nobody can dispute it was the right transfer in the long term.
![](https://thoughtcatalog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Tom-Cruise-Mummy.webp?w=768)
It wasn’t meant to final without end, although. As 2017’s The Mummy, starring Tom Cruise and Sofia Boutella, demonstrated, the action-adventure method not related with the followers. On this occasion, the reverse occurred: Audiences needed to be scared once more! This isn’t uncommon, after all, as Hollywood goes by cycles on a regular basis. That mentioned, 1999’s The Mummy proved to be a film launched on the proper time and below the proper style banner. Not solely did it enthrall, nevertheless it additionally nonetheless holds up as a cinema basic 25 years later.